![]() So, you operate from lowsec and daytrip to WH. People will still gank you if you let your cargo get too valuable, but it’s not the same “oh god everyone wants to kill me” feeling I get in lower security space. Either that or I need to install jump clones and establish several jump-off points for exploration Sometimes I do that when I want to relax a bit. I think one of the skills I really need to improve is WH mapping so I can get to remote areas of the map without having to actually jump the whole way. Stain is a lot more inhabited, and also SO FAR AWAY from my current main base of operations. Regarding Null, I’ll admit the only region I’ve explored to any real extent is Querious, because it seems to me NO ONE LIVES THERE. I think I’ve only died twice in WHs to campers, and one of those times I knew there was someone in there and got greedy I do most of that stuff, but I didn’t think to see if there were any third-party tools to help with determining the likelihood of site campers. ![]() Sansha>Guristas>Serpentis>Angels>Blood Raiders source: ![]() Maximize your efficiency in null based on the local rat type. With a few exceptions there aren’t pirate sites higher than C3. I’ve caught many explorers who neglected to do that.Īlso you should make sure to maximize your efficiency in wspace by avoiding C4 and up. Kspace has map intel but you can still check the citadels and zkill of the resident wormhole corp to see if they are likely to be camping sites when you are hacking. With regards to danger, null is now in local blackout raising the danger level closer to wspace. LS is much more interconnected with wspace than null and is pretty deserted making wormholes with LS statics less picked over. For finding sites in whs while daytripping, try scanning up from LS. If you play in EU primetime, expect more competition on that score than if you play in US or AUtz. Adding signatures to the agency was a recent poor change making it possible for explorers to go straight to systems with sigs. Maybe I should focus on WHs and just resign myself that I may go days without finding a site, but that when I do it will make up for lost time? Where do you guys explore, and why?īoth null and wormholes are good places to explore and each has some tradeoffs. I mean, at least I can look at the F10 map to get a sense of what’s going on in null. In addition, WHs are just more dangerous due to the lack of local as well as a general lack of available intelligence. I spend a ton of time scanning down everything, only to be unable to actually loot any sites. WHs are opposite of null–an overabundance of sites, but typically they are either 1) more WHs 2) Unsecure/Forgotten sites 3) Gas sites. That said, I’ve done A TON of WH exploration and that’s the first time I’ve found such a site. I’ve found one fabulous WH Relic site that got me 250 mil. I know the sites are lucrative, but you gotta find em first, you know? ![]() I went 20 systems deep yesterday and found ONE data site. Almost every null system I’ve been to has between 0-2 signatures, which are (almost) always combat sites or WHs. ![]() The problem with null that I’ve been finding is that it’s almost site-less. Low sec offers middling, but consistent, returns at relatively low risk. I ask because, having done a decent amount in all three places, I’m kind of torn. Do you prefer low, null, or WH exploration? Hi sec stuff is not really worth it, so let’s ignore hi sec for now. For now, I’ve been limiting myself to Relic/Data sites (including ghost and sleeper caches), but I’ve done it in all relevant areas of the game–Hi, Low, and Null Sec, as well as W-Space. Sorry it’s a bit wordy.Īnyway, I’ve been playing for about two months, and have been focusing exclusively on Exploration for the time being. I guess this could also go in W-Space…first time posting a new topic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |